Some people think paying taxes is a big enough contribution to their society, while others think people have more responsibilities as members of society than only paying taxes. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people are of the opinion that the only sufficient contribution to society is by governments collecting taxes from citizens while others argue that individuals have other liabilities to take care of their community. Although the total value of taxes gathered by authorities is huge enough to mitigate some problems, a supportive and caring population builds up even a bigger picture of what is called society
The conventional approach for making society better to live in has always been implemented by collecting taxes from civils of a country. Of course, by doing so authorities are able to create more job opportunities like building new schools, improving the infrastructure of cities, developing national health service (NHS), and even military forces are equipped through the government budget compiled from taxes for electricity, gas, and drinking water. If there were not taxes collected, current conditions of developing or even developed countries would not have been so. Thus, the former though of school opine that paying taxes is highly likely to encourage societies as a whole.
However, residents of a country are in charge of not only paying taxes for a big contribution but also humane traits make up a well-constructed community as well. To be more precise, nobody can imagine the mundane life like being at a loss of support to neighbors or even others. While the life in cites gets boring to dwell in, the paid taxes cannot make the city life interesting, since people lack common manners to communicate. Moreover, empathy is considered to be the priority of the individuals when dealing with bringing out great support to society. This adds a bit of taste to the life of people altogether having a sufficient contribution to their life circle.
In conclusion, as long as people have a duty to pay for what they use where society happens to develop, they are also obliged to be empathetic and well-mannered in which society flourishes even more. I have come to the conclusion that both views should be interchangeably supported as they have the exact role to play.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0988372093 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93861273989 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59011627907 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.0482715028 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.166666667 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32411688234 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114002763694 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827318652058 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19484491525 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607992660733 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.