In this pace of life, human being have been forgotten towards their original task “save the earth”. To rising the cost of fuel is the extraordinary method to mitigate the issue of traffic congestion as well as pollution conflict. I firmly discord consummate to the writer notion and reason of my inclination are articulated in the upcoming paragraph.
To begin with, the predominant justification to support my ideology is that the vehicle is the most Paramount mode to relocate us by one place to another area therefore, whether the price of petrol will likely to rise or not, no matter owing to this is reasonable to the extent that millions of people worldwide have to deal with there own vehicle and fill out the petrol in terms of there work purpose. Considering Further, instead of rising up the amount of fuel administrative ought to introduce new policy such as, eco-friendly cars and bike in order to travel. As a result, the rate of pollution will likely to deteriorate in the future. For instance, in New Zealand, appropriate more than 50% of citizen is using electric vehicle to protect the nature.
Moreover, to soothe the traffic hurdle One should adhere all the rules and regulation which had been declared by regulatory bodies. To explicate, whenever any person travel outside from they home by any vehicle they should follow rules to destroy the chain of traffic rather than inclining the cost of fuel. To epitome, in Canada, the rate of fuel is minimal Du to the fact that every citizen is following every rules so, government could not get any chance to rise the price of fuel.
In conclusion, although in order to save the nature and maintain the traffic woe is a crucial one, yet to increase the price of petrol is not an appropriate way because in this contemporary era, not all the people are richer and it can impact on them regular life, who are deprived.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...s of people worldwide have to deal with there own vehicle and fill out the petrol in term...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79204892966 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65695563672 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577981651376 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.9630778259 49.4020404114 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.454545455 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7272727273 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0850558664377 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289684532529 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265400036484 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531131484087 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216837029948 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.