Some people argue that technological inventions, such as smartphones, are making people socially less interactive. Discuss both views.
Technological developments and their impact on society are one of the most controversial topics in the present day. There are people that are certain that technologies make us more isolated from the rest of the world. Others oppose by saying that technological progress brings everyone together. The following essay takes a look at both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, mobile phone users tend to spend more time on their phones, rather than having a face-to-face conversation with their family or friends. This may have a negative impact on users real-life relationships and possibly lead to breakups. Another point to be considered is that more and more children own a smartphone nowadays. Thus, preferring it to playing outside with their peers. Consequently, this may lead to a lack of social and physical activity.
On the other hand, many would argue that due to modern days’ technological advantage people are getting closer. For instance, with a help of the Internet geographical location is no longer an issue in communication. It has become easier to get in touch with someone who is on the other side of the globe. In addition, communicating with others via online messengers is both faster and cheaper, compared to older ways, such as sending a letter or a telegram. Furthermore, it is worth noticing that the Internet and smartphones make widen people’s social networks. As social media platforms allow users to join communities and make new connections. Therefore, making people more socially active.
In the final analysis, while technologies may affect negatively on a relationships between people, its benefit is undeniable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a relationship' or simply 'relationships'?
Suggestion: a relationship; relationships
...e technologies may affect negatively on a relationships between people, its benefit is undeniab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25187969925 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04084217383 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624060150376 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2793489821 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.1764705882 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22935043007 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072696468914 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821688971497 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119781133263 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951097599845 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.