The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.
Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate.
The given graph illustrate the percentages of the employment in 6 nations in 2 years, 1995 and 2005.
Overall, the percentages of the male-employee hiring and the percentages of the female-employee hiring increased from 1995 to 2005.
In Australia, Iceland, and New Zealand, the figures for male hiring were approximately twice the figures for female hiring in every single year, in 1995 and 2005. In Australia, the percentage for employment in males slightly rose from about 57% to nearly 70%. Moreover, the figure for the male-employee employment increased approximately 10% in Iceland and New Zealand. In Iceland, the figure grew from about 70% to around 83%. In addition, the figure went up from 60% to nearly 70%.
In Switzerland, UK, and USA , furthermore, the accounts for male hiring were generally tiny higher than the account for female hiring in the same years, in 1995 and 2005. The proportion of the male-employee employment rose approximately 12% in both two countries, Switzerland and the USA, from about 65% to just under 80% in Switzerland and from just under 60% to 71% in America. Besides, in UK, it was a significant increase in male-stuff hiring, almost 15 percent, from 55% in 1995 to 72% in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...figure went up from 60% to nearly 70%. In Switzerland, UK, and USA , furthermore,...
^^
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nearly 70%. In Switzerland, UK, and USA , furthermore, the accounts for male hiri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, moreover, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02955665025 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05726377402 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467980295567 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2775323456 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0829087622287 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450762433938 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458829640532 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799749462177 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528200173581 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.