The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph gives information about the Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. It shows the number of library books read by both genders (men and women).

Overall, it is evident that, initially number of books read by female were more as compared to men. However, with time, they decreased and men showed an increasing trend.

In 2011, men read almost 3000 books whereas female read about 5000 books. In the following year, both showed an increasing trend, in which books read by female rose significantly by 3000 books however, in case of males, it increased by a mere 500 books.

Furthermore, in between the years 2012 and 2013, books read by males rose exponentially from almost 3800 to approximately 9000 and reaching a peak value of about 14000 books in 2014 whereas in case of females, the trend increased by a substantial amount from 8000 to 10000 but it declined ultimately, reaching just above 8000 books.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...umber of books read by female were more as compared to men. However, with time, th...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and men showed an increasing trend. In 2011, men read almost 3000 books wher...
^^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mately, reaching just above 8000 books.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88679245283 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52728475426 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572327044025 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.4230943097 43.030603864 208% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29650481591 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169220885741 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981834991177 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213255034517 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147837196116 0.0819641961636 180% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.