The restoration of old buildings in major cities throughout the world involves enormous expenditure. This money would bring more benefits it was used to provide new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A great amount of money is spent to improve the infrastructure in different nations. Many people believe that money should be used on improving condition of old buildings while others feel that it wastes money and it should be used to provide new housing and development of roads. I completely agree, that money should be spent on future developments rather than using it for restoration of old buildings.
Firstly, some people do not own house and they live in unhygienic conditions, therefore money should be used to provide housing to these people. It will improve the overall condition of country. Another reason, is that it will give a sense of fulfillment and motivation to work hard. For example, a very well known celebrity built some houses who did not own a house before and they said, it will be easier for them now to concentrate on their work as their family is safe at home rather than roaming here and there around the city. Thus, spending money for the betterment of society will be far more beneficial than spending it on restoration of buildings.
Furthermore, spending money on development of roads means lesser accidents. As the roads will improve, it will lead to people involving in less accidents due to bad road conditions like pot holes. It will ultimately, lead to better overall health and safety index of a nation. Take developed countries, for instance, accident rate is much lower in those countries comparing to developing as they spend a great amount of money on road development. Therefore, improving road conditions will result in fewer accidents.
In conclusion, money spent on future endeavours for overall development of society including housing and road development is much more beneficiary than spending money for the restoration of old buildings which do not have any use other than being counted as historical building.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-01 | ASHISH SAINI | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- Some say that the most important thing about being rich is that one has the opportunity to help other To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- Online education is becoming increasing popular. Many university students are choosing to study online instead of face to face. Do the advantages of distance education outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Many parents believe that when their children read books for entertainment, they are wasting their time, and that they should read only serious, educational books. What is your opinion about this? 59
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun accidents is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ve, it will lead to people involving in less accidents due to bad road conditions li...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06796116505 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81519173607 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511326860841 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4445833237 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.857142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189100253505 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697458467155 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581480144884 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13255575707 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038366943345 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.