The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart represents the three major airports (John F. Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark) in New York city, which were preferred by travellers from 1995 to 2000.
Overall, the number of travellers using John F. Kennedy airport fluctuated between 1995 and 2000. However, in case of LaGuardia airport, travellers increased by a significant margin whereas visitors in Newark airport were increased by more than three times.
It is clear that, in 1995, number of visitors were more in LaGuardia airport accounting almost 35 millions as compared to John F. Kennedy and Newark airport at around 25 millions and approximately 15 millions respectively. By the end of 1997, number of travellers using John F. Kennedy airport overtook the travellers in LaGuardia airport by a margin of almost 4 millions whereas users of Newark airport remained relatively low at about 38 millions.
From the year 1998 to 2000, travellers using LaGuardia airport increased significantly, they were about 45 millions in 1998 and almost 70 million in 2000. However, visitors of John F. Kennedy airport fluctuated from almost 35 million to 45 millions in the same period. Surprisingly, number of travellers remained exactly same at Newark airport from 1998 to 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wark airport were increased by more than three times. It is clear that, in 199...
^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly, they were about 45 millions in 1998 and almost 70 million in 2000. However, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27638190955 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82994445913 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437185929648 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2829369487 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7692307692 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3076923077 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.53846153846 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22474783812 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110307843105 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610810653014 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179907054478 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558151886192 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.