the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by Tourist Information Office in one city a six month period in 2011

Essay topics:

the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by Tourist Information Office in one city a six-month period in 2011

The line graph compares the information about the quantity of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in particular city during a six-month period in 2011.

Overall, while the number of in person and by letter or email enquiries experienced a significant increase, there was a remarkable plummet in the quantity of enquiries over the timescale period. Additionally, in person enquiries was the most common choice among three option at the end of this given period.

According to the line graph, Tourist Information Office received approximately 900 enquiries in January, which was the highest quantity, and the number of this enquiries was over twice that of enquiries received by in person. This figure then saw a slight fall and came to the lowest point in February, at exactly 800 enquiries, followed by an exponential growth of precisely 1400 enquiries in June. Likewise, the number of enquiries received by telephone was the lowest figure in January, at under 400 enquiries, this figure continued skyrocket and then dethroned the figure for in person enquiries in April, before ending to about 1900 enquiries.
By contrast, tourist would not rather send enquiries by letter or email and hence it observed an opposite trend compared to the two counterpart. Starting at below 800 enquiries in January, the figure for letter or email enquiries was the second only common option. However, there was an noticeable decline in the quantity of letter or email enquiries, before reach the lowest point at under 400 enquiries at the end of the given period.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (56 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...the highest quantity, and the number of this enquiries was over twice that of enquir...
^^^^
Line 6, column 284, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... only common option. However, there was an noticeable decline in the quantity of l...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, likewise, second, so, then, while, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20078740157 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77148856435 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456692913386 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5258091568 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.777777778 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313994452707 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1551877438 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155425116027 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24665728505 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173970680901 0.0819641961636 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.