The graph illustrates how the number of requests by the Tourist Information Office changed over the period of 6 month in 2011. Three categories of enquiries are considered - in person, by letter/email and by telephone.
It is observed that starting from just above 400 in January, requests in person steadily grew to approximately 1900 by the end of the period. Similarly, letter/email applications also rose, but saw a fluctuation. Its number stood at about 900 in January and then slightly fell to 800 in one month, however, it then gradually climbed to 1600 by June.
In contrast to other two categories, it is observed that telephone enquiries saw a noticeable decrease. At the beginning of the described period there were just below 800 requests. Following this, the number slowly declined to around 400 in June.
Overall, there is a significant difference between telephone enquiries and other types of applications. As personal and letter/email requests grew in popularity over the period given, telephone ones lost their relevance according to the graph.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...ion Office changed over the period of 6 month in 2011. Three categories of enquiries ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...larity over the period given, telephone ones lost their relevance according to the g...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, then, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26470588235 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06388104422 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7920852042 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262191235679 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923056482509 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108765490622 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163879409115 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104885796078 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.