The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the number of questions was asked to a Tourist Information Office in three ways over the first half period of 2011.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the number of queries asked by telephone and in-person while the opposite was true for the figure for questions received by letter or mail.
In January, the number of people who sent an email and who made a phone call to the office started at around 800. In the following two months, while the former dipped down gradually to roughly 700, the latter bounced back after a moderate fall in February. The opposite scenario continued till the end of the period shown. In June, the number of questions sent in person remained the lowest, at nearly 400. The figure for questions from telephone soared to 1600.
Meanwhile, starting from the lowest of over 400, the number of queries received in-person experienced a continual increase throughout the entire period. This figure surpassed the telephone's in the middle of March and finally reach the highest point in June, at around 1900.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: SENT_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'emailed'.
Suggestion: emailed
... In January, the number of people who sent an email and who made a phone call to the office...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89502762431 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40130099146 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9551815917 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141842529895 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586238612863 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795897174469 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107340711604 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922130541832 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.