The graph below shows the number of movie tickets sold around the world each year from 1980 to 2010 Ticket sales acoording to genre are presented in millions Summirise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of movie tickets sold around the world each year from 1980 to 2010. Ticket sales, acoording to genre, are presented in millions.
Summirise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The line chart presents the changes in global sales of movie tickets over a thirty-year period starting in 1980. Sales are divided by film type and are shown in millions. Overall, sales have increased during this span, with the exception of comedy films, which saw a slight decline.
Comedy films were top sellers with just over 600 million tickets sold in 1980 and steadily fell to around 350 million by 2000, roughly equal to horror film ticket sales. At this point, the genre saw a rebound and finished period with about 500 million in sales by 2010.
All four of the other genres witnessed an increase in sales, with action/adventure and animation movies showing the greatest rises, especially after 2000. Action/adventure ticket sales almost quadrupled from just under 400 million to about 1.5 billion over the span of the graph, while animation films, which started at the same level as documentaries in 1980 grew 12 times, going from 100 million to 1.2 billion. Documentaries and horror films, though tripling and nearly doubling respectively, had a less significant rise.
In summary, despite a slight decrease in comedy genre, the film genres have increased over the given period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
... sales have increased during this span, with the exception of comedy films, which saw a slight declin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09693877551 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61703861016 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617346938776 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0913721698 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228014742545 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884348208525 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702353162591 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1301286478 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643627131475 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.