The graph below shows the number of passengers using three railway networks from 1950 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of passengers using three railway networks from 1950 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

fghhh

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Great
...sing three distinct rail networks namely,Great Western, Northern and Light Rail networ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the Light Rail network had a much slower surge. Furthermore,the Light Rail networ...
^^
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...rk had a much slower surge. Furthermore,the Light Rail network had been the least u...
^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a zenith of roughly 315 million surveyed in the last 20 years.When it comes to th...
^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
... million surveyed in the last 20 years.When it comes to that figure of Great Wester...
^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , beginning
...it comes to that figure of Great Western,beginning with 250 million in the 1950s,it then w...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, regarding, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89215686275 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83499510261 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563725490196 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.3319327607 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.333333333 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111030585018 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070370016069 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437256911574 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788331495942 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411935922092 0.0819641961636 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.