The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph compared the number of closures and opening stores in one nation from 2011 to 2018.
General speaking, both lines have dramatically fluctuated with a downward trend between 2011 and 2016, then they had a slightly change until 2018. While the total of opening stores observed more changes than the closing ones.
Looking at the opening stores line, it is easily apperant that 2011 has significantly gained the highest level with 8,500 stores, then it witnessed a substantial decline to 4,000 shops in one year. Two years later, the chart illustrated a positive change with more 2, 000 shops was opened in 2014, before experienced a considerable peak to 4, 000 stores in 2015, which is equal compared with 2012, while remained its rank until 2017. But after a slight dip in 2018, there was only 3,000 shops that opened in this nation.
Whilst, the closing shops total started at a lower rank than opening ones with approximately 6, 500 stores in 2011. Then, this number remained a moderate unchanged during three years until 2014, before dropped unexpectedly by 6, 000 shops in 2015. After that, the amount of closing shops sharply increased to 5, 000 stores in 2016, while it maintained around that from 2016 to 2018.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('change') instead of another adjective.
...nd between 2011 and 2016, then they had a slightly change until 2018. While the total of opening ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... they had a slightly change until 2018. While the total of opening stores observed mo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94258373206 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41773133003 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588516746411 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2115614239 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.777777778 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223594139987 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114961587054 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588795086362 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168055870555 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632834245161 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.