Some countries are struggling with increases in crime rates. Some believe that having more police on the streets is best way to reduce and combat crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
We live in an age when many of us are grappling with enhancing levels of criminality, while some consider that increasing police presence on the streets is the optimal solution. In my opinion, it is thought to be efficient in some particular consequences, but there are better measures for this phenomenon.
Firstly, let’s take a look at why thousands of citizens agreed with the idea of having more law enforcement agencies on the roads. When it comes to police officers, their influences will act as a deterrent against people who have anti-society behaviours. Therefore, they can timely prevent lawbreakers from putting society in danger. Furthermore, increasing police presence on the street will narrow the round of offenders, which will lead to a sense of safety and security for both national citizens and international tourists.
Despite the fact that raising the levels of policemen can basically control criminality. From my point of view, the major reasons for that are related to poverty directly and education. This would easily observe in many slums in South-Asian countries, such as India, where adolescents turn to illegal acts to generate income. As a result, governments should build several policies to promote crime prevent programs to curb the number of offenders. On top of that, it is necessary to constructively operate education to citizens in general and adolescents, the potential criminals, so they can have a great vision of crimes. With respect to people engaged in unlawful activities, the states should organize rehabilitation programmes so they can be given the chance to redo their life and avoid re-offend.
To sum up, also enhancing police officers, I support that the chairmen of a country need to concentrate on raising education and erasing poverty to completely deal with criminality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... putting society in danger. Furthermore, increasing police presence on the street...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, while, in general, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up, with respect to, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31615120275 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00806063923 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625429553265 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3744842239 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5384615385 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156240941638 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450970366433 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425439362988 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912514888231 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398442283504 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.