Some countries are struggling with increases in crime rates. Some believe that having more police on the streets is best way to reduce and combat crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s world, most countries show a great concern related to the problems of crime. It is acknowledged that these days, the proportion of crime is increasing day by day. Coming to this issue, it is thought that having more police on the street is the only way to decline the level of crime. From my perspective, I am totally convinced by this statement.
To begin with, the most frequent factor contributing to this view is that, there are several kinds of crime which can only be eliminated by force, especially terrorism. To cite an example, statistics in this field indicates that over the past decade, terrorists killed an average of 21,000 people worldwide each year. Therefore, it is impossible for normal people to constrain this type of crimes. To put it in another way, only police can deal with this sort of crimes. As a result, it is undisputed that more police needed in the street to prevent crimes.
In addition, one explanation to support this view is that only police are able to deter those intending to commit crimes. To rephrase, they have the rights to censor the information or the items belonging to owners. To vindicate, by measuring the alcohol concentration and inspecting the private vehicles, police hindered a large number of illicit drug transactions. As this example reveals, it cannot be denied that adding more police in the streets can decrease the percentage of crimes in this day and age by scrutinizing citizens.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that to solve the growing rate of crimes, having more police on the streets is a viable solution. As a consequence of this, I wholly agree with this statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...g the private vehicles, police hindered a large number of illicit drug transactions. As this exam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, therefore, in addition, sort of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9014084507 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80022351532 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566901408451 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9855226932 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206328481931 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745668912855 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613552661005 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143316261368 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472520293228 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.