The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates how many visitors travelled to a Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017 in one-year intervals.
Overall, the numbers of visitors to this island underwent an upward trend in spite of the activities they chose. It is also worth pointing out that at the beginning, tourists preferred to stay on island where as at the end, staying on cruise ships became a more popular option.
A quick glance at the line chart reveals that during the first two years of the given period, it is recorded that around 0.75 million visitors chose to stay on island. In the next three years, this figure witnessed a noticeable increase of 0.75 million before flattening out at the end of the period, despite a slight drop of just 0.25 million in 2016. Showing a different pattern, while showing a mild fluctuation between 2010 and 2013, the figure for visitors who chose to stay on the ships climbed significantly from 0.5 million, surpassing their island counterpart, and reached a peak at two million at the end.
Turning to the other set of data, the total number of visitors to this Caribbean island was one million at the beginning. As of 2012, there was a sharp rise, reaching the highest point at 3.5 million in 2017.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...g, tourists preferred to stay on island where as at the end, staying on cruise ships bec...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77102803738 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52506432881 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57476635514 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0022535569 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.625 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12507431241 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06341480028 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038802684783 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914234490552 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230198970095 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.