The graph illustrates the pattern of travellers going to the Caribbean island, categorized by whether they lived on cruise ships, in local accommodations or both of them, from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the majority of people had a tendency of choosing both the two options of housing between 2010 and 2017. It is also apparent that at the end of the survey, more people intended to stay on the cruise ships which took the second place of the visitors staying on island in the previous years.
Regarding the number of people having experiences of living in both places, it was recorded as the highest figure in the past 7 years. Starting at 1 million people in 2010, the growth gradually happened until 2015 at relatively 2.7 millions, then remaining unchanged in the next year. The year of 2017 witnessed a dramatic jumpto exactly 3.5 million people staying on the cruise ships and on island.
In terms of the number of travellers who lived in local housing, its figure in 2010 and 2011 was roughly 0.7 million then it started to rise slightly before decreasing to 1.4 million people in 2016 and recovered in the next year at 1.5 million. A reserve trend can be seen in the pattern of visitors staying on ships whose figure fluctuated in the first 2 years. Those visitors’ number went up exponentially over the 3 years from 2013, surpassing the figure of previous types of travellers in 2016, and continued its rising trend to 2 million people in 2017.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, regarding, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77165354331 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57520043168 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543307086614 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.2215081346 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105650500384 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517354181155 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402127467612 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799919495197 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346129203193 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.