The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the figure of visitors to the Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017. Overall, it can be clear that there was increase in the numbers of tourists to this island in the period of 17 years. In general, the total figure of visitors gradually went up from 1 million in 2010 to 2.7 millions in 2016 and peak at 3.5 millions. Meanwhile, there were changes in the patterns of visitors staying on cruise ships and those staying on island. The figure staying on cruise went up about 0.25 million from 2010 to 2011 before dropping to the starting point in 2012. However, this number gradually increased and surplus the number of those staying on island in the middle of 2015, then peaked at 2 millions in 2017. Whereas, the number of staying on island reached at 1.5 millions in 2013 and maintained until 2015 before witnessing a downtrend after 1 year. In conclusion, the period from 2010 to 2017 saw an uptrend of tourists to the Caribbean island.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, whereas, while, in conclusion, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63157894737 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43727087534 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514619883041 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.0521488289 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173373677059 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947099442653 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690679627473 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173373677059 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.