The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph given illustrates how the number of visitors to a specific Caribbean Island fluctuated over a period of 7 years.
Overall, both the number of visitors remaining on cruise ships and that on island increased from 2010 to 2017. It is also true that there was a dramatical rise in the total number of visitors to this island.
It can be observed that in 2010, there were approximately 0.2 million of visitors choosing to stay on ships while the figure for those who staying on this island was higher, at 0.7 million. The total number of visitors in this year stood at 1 million. In 2011, the number of visitors staying on cruise ship rose to 0.5 before falling back to the same level of 2010 figure in 2012. After that, the figures constantly rose to the 2 millions of visitors in 2017 that overtook the figure for visitors staying on island.
Between 2010 and 2011, the number of visitors staying on islands remained relatively unchanged, at 0.7 million. This trend wasn’t followed in 2012 and 2013 that there was a significant rise to 1.5 million in 2013. However, this figure stayed unchanged until 2015 that Caribbean people witnessed a decrease to 1.25 in the number of visitors staying on this island. In addition, the total number of visitors traveling to this island jumped to the level of 3.5 million at the end of this period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...hat, the figures constantly rose to the 2 millions of visitors in 2017 that overtook the figu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sland jumped to the level of 3.5 million at the end of this period.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69327731092 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45927567828 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8850173631 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.545454545 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133787537071 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744102213174 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439108609884 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111710219471 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272483769597 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.