The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.
The provided line graph illustrates information about tourists, measured in millions of tourists, of three different categories, who visited the Caribbean island, over 7 years.
As an overall trend, it is apparently observed that the number of total tourists rose considerably, while other two groups experienced fluctuations, despite some increases at the end of periods.
In 2010, the total of visitors were 1 million people. Followed by a moderate increasing by 2012, it continued to roar considerably and from 2015 to 2016 had a stagnation, below 2.75 million of visitors. However, it reached the peak, at 3.5 million in 2017.
Furthermore, the number of people who stayed on cruise ships and on island stood, approximately at 0.25 and 1.25 million people respectively. Subsequently, the figure of the former group remained constantly, while the latter group continued to rise. Although, the first category commenced to uproar, whereas another one oscillated. The number of cruise ships category had a plateau at 1.5 million, whilst on island it was lower than 1 million tourists. Nonetheless, in 2015, they started to indicate a converse trend and reached the apex at the end of period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 561, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reached the apex at the end of period.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28272251309 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02413017905 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643979057592 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2831094339 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101885768669 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376407746769 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306997646677 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639830018289 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234871459441 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.