The bar chart illustrates a comparison on number of trips made by children (age 5-12 years old) to school in the years 1990 and 2010. In addition, the graph shows details on the different media of transportation used by children to commute between their home and school. Units for the number of trips is illustrated in millions per year.
It can be observed that, in the year 1990, above 12 million trips made by the children are by feet, whereas in the year 2010, majority used cars to reach school and back home (around 11 million trips per year) and the least number of trips being those made by cycles ( exactly 2 millions per year). Only less than half percentage of trips used cars for transportation in the year 1990 in comparison to those in the year 2010.
The number of trips made by using cycles and those included walking as well as travelling in buses remained almost same in the year 2010. However, the number of trips made using bus alone as a medium is a million more than those included walking and hiring bus. In the year 1990, the number of trips made by children using cycle as a medium to commute is less than a quarter when compared to the cycle trips in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on number of trips made by children age 5-12 years old to school in the years 19...
^^
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mber of trips being those made by cycles exactly 2 millions per year. Only less t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, whereas, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42857142857 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3085671897 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437788018433 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.9036123723 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245635132574 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141819737054 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525790710323 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200984736953 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039489269368 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.