The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the number of university graduates between males and females in Canada from 1992 to 2007. Overall, it is important to note that the number of female graduates had always been higher than the number of male graduates over the timeline.
Starting sequentially at 70,000 and 100,000, the figures of both male and female graduated students had witnessed a slight increase of 10,000 students between the period of 1992 and 1995. Those figures experienced a decline from 1995 to 1998, when the figures for female graduates hit the lowest point of the period on 1998.
After the falls, there had been a significant increase in both figures. The number of female graduates had increased significantly by over 50,000 right after 1998 and it hit the peak of nearly 150,000 graduated students on 2007. Unlike the female graduates' figure, the males' had been fluctuating for 3 years after 1998. It was not until 2002 that the number of male graduates started to rise. The number of male graduated students had increased significantly by 20,000 students, yet it was certainly lower than the female graduates.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ates between males and females in Canada from 1992 to 2007. Overall, it is import...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0376344086 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5954826593 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494623655914 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3058761465 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158263218359 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919625715461 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927376004444 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138690399008 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891974072074 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.