The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012.
Given is the line graph depicting the proportion of Australians who find employment in four foreign countries namely Japan, the US, China and India over a period of 22 years.
It is conspicuous that the percentage of Australia workers working in India and China saw an upward trend while the reverse was true for that of employees in the other two nations. Additionally, Australian exports to India accounted for the lowest proportion despite several swings.
Standing at about 1% in 1990, the percentage of people working in India stayed unchanged during the next ten years before soaring exponentially and reached a high point at 7% in 2010 and then witnessed a significant decrease at 5% in the last year. Similarly, an drastical rocket was seen in the figure of workers who employ in China from 2% in the first year to 27% and became the highest proportion as opposed to three remaining countries throughout the year.
By contrast, there was a dramatic plunge in the figure of Australian exports to Japan and the US. Starting at the most dominant point with around 26%, the proportion of workers in the former countries experienced a constant plummet and hit a low of 16% in 2012. Moreover, in spite of some fluctuations around 11% to 5% in 2010, the figure of exporters to the US saw a recovery and accounted for 7% at the end of the time frame.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ease at 5% in the last year. Similarly, an drastical rocket was seen in the figure...
^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m 2% in the first year to 27% and became the highest proportion as opposed to thr...
^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er, in spite of some fluctuations around 11% to 5% in 2010, the figure of exporte...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77118644068 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75435462592 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567796610169 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.6491080714 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.75 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189393137458 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778790680744 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313251230664 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104240598283 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164537840777 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.