The graph illustrated the household access ( CD player, Mobile, Home Computer, Internet access) to modern technology in UK for the period from 1996 to 2003.
Overall, domestic access to modern technology increased sharply over given period. CD player was the popular and Internet access was the least one. And the home computer has replaced by mobile phone during the period.
Firstly, CD player began around 60%on 1996 and then increased steadily to just over 80% by 2003. Similarly, the home computer access also climbed from 30% to 50%. On the other hand, mobile phone usage started below 20% in the began then it went up over the home computer in 1996 and reached 70% in 2003. While internet access started with 10% in 1996 and it rise to over 40% in 2003.
Modern technology gas significantly involved in the domestic access ( CD player, Mobile, Home Computer, Internet access ) in the given period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e graph illustrated the household access CD player, Mobile, Home Computer, Intern...
^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
... access started with 10% in 1996 and it rise to over 40% in 2003. Modern technolo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ficantly involved in the domestic access CD player, Mobile, Home Computer, Intern...
^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., Mobile, Home Computer, Internet access in the given period.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, similarly, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 755.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96710526316 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34955018681 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486842105263 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9371241425 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8888888889 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246948397844 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117421320411 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092496280402 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19364474119 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669726342246 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.