Currently, the argument is children participate, whether they can plat seriously or only in free time. In my opinion, I strongly recommended to spend time in sports.
It is obvious, that children who participate in sports being a well disciplined and organized. It os induce them to be on time and be a well trained. These are not only for sports it is important life skills, for instance, my friend who is a basketball player is appreciated by our class teacher for punctual and time management. These beneficial implies about sports, not only that, sports helps in maintaining fitness in youngers. Instead of being lazy. In addition to those manay companies concern on sportsperson for their job because of being active.
Secondly, people playing sports are trained to be a team worker and target achiever. They are well equipped to overcome from failures. The mental fitness guides them to achieve their goal, many sportspersons proved this in their life. It can be seen, sportsmen who, failure in the field of sports, are the successful man in their life.
In conclusion, children should participate in sports not only in their leisure time but seriously so it helps them to grow a successful person. School should provide facilities for these children to encourage them to participate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended spending'.
Suggestion: recommended spending
...in free time. In my opinion, I strongly recommended to spend time in sports. It is obvious, that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 214.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07476635514 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83661410778 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57476635514 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5385516122 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5714285714 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2857142857 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201877868695 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697658342105 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516168673702 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133148871975 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212803571025 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.