The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph reveals information on the proportion of three distinguished types of turtle population in comparison with the figure for all species in India from 1980 to 2012. From a quick glance, the population of general creatures fluctuated over the given period, simultaneously, the statistic of Olive Ridley Turtles witnessed a noticeable upward trend which is contradictory in terms of Leatherback and Green turtles.
When taking a closer look at the proportion of the Olive Ridley Turtles, the figures commenced at exactly 100% which was equal to other categories before a considerable increase of over 30% took place in the period of 16 years beginning in 1980. In 1996, the percentage of Olive Ridley Turtles reached a peak at above 130% and fluctuated until 2012. Nevertheless, the figure for the population of total animals in India fluctuated minimally around 100%.
Moving on to analyse the remaining categories, the ratio of Green Turtles initially encountered a wide fluctuation around its original data from 1980 and 1998, followed by a steady decline of approximately 20% in the next two years. In the last decade of the given time, the statistic remained almost unchanged. More considerably, the population figure for Leatherback Turtles initiatively climbed to the highest point at over 110%. In contrast, a consecutive sharp fall was recorded that made the figure dive to just over 50%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, nevertheless, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26548672566 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01099611094 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592920353982 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.856371965 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.222222222 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18820057814 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826005361373 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880068389374 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13590765029 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626197661278 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.