It is well-documented fact that in the present day, a wide range number of people all over the world are paying attention to nature and the environment. It is undeniable that the figure of fauna and floral is significantly falling. This has been a highly problematic issue, and this raises the question in relation to its problems and potential solutions to deal with. Therefore, some major points will be addressed in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, the economic exploitation activities of the 4.0 industrial evolution are considered to be the two main causes of extinction and depletion of natural features. It is commonly believed that mineral extraction and the hunting for commercial demands is the reason why the amount of animals goes down over time. Base on the report provided by WSPA, not only does the shortage of habitat cause almost all of the species to have less food to maintain their life but also a huge range of pollutants are discharged into the environment that animals have to bear the massive burden. In addition to this, there is no doubt that nowadays, many people make use of the soil for cultivating agriculture as well as deforesting to trade in money. According to these above activities, a wide range kind of floral are disappeared or are close to the alarming rate.
Secondly, to cope with the above issue, there are two primary solutions that could be taken into consideration. First and foremost, it is undeniable that education should be a pioneer in approaching and providing knowledge about wildlife habitats. According to an increasing quantity of wisdom, people will object to the natural environment destruction and they suppose that it is an immoral act because all of the species have the right to live. Equally important, it is widely believed that we should develop an extra number of conservationists and scholars in order to establish several nature guardian organizations. In that way, many species of fauna and floral will be researched and protected from the risk of extinction by kind-hearted people.
To conclude, It is my strong belief that there is a big amount of issue related to animals and plants life. I, therefore, highly recommend that the awareness of natural habitats should be enhanced in the contemporary world. If this recommendation is carried out, the comprehensive development of the Earth will be guaranteed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 404, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...es the shortage of habitat cause almost all of the species to have less food to maintain t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ppose that it is an immoral act because all of the species have the right to live. Equally...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
... of the species have the right to live. Equally important, it is widely believed that w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, kind of, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08673469388 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00011713641 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8171216664 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.294117647 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0588235294 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0723872619344 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0220050484221 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357604291519 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0448024692344 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216287655181 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.