The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that wre recycled form 1982 to 2010 in particular country.
Summarse the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons while relevant
The given line graph illustrates several types of material recycling over a thirty year period. Overall, paper and cardboards were the highest recycled material following glass containers rating in second, which had some decrease in the beginning. While aluminum cans and plastics rating indicated only increase without any down falls.
Firstly the paper and cardboard usage recycling rate( is fairly stable, with some fluctuatation during 1982 to 1990 (around 70 - 80 percent). Afterwards its recycling percentage showed stable decrease with 10 per cent in over two decades. In contrast, glass containers recycling started with some decrease fro 1982 to 1986 (around 50 to 40 percent). Then subsequently started to grow and remained it unitl 2010 (60 percent).
Furthermore, aluminum cans recycling started two years later in 1984, showed a stable increase over a 25 years from 4 to 45 percent. While plastics recycling process, which started in 1986 rose relatively constant (0 to 10 percent) with some show of stabilization from 1992 to 1996 (around 5 percent).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 305, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...rs recycling started with some decrease fro 1982 to 1986 around 50 to 40 percent. T...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, second, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4371257485 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76508437665 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62874251497 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7225856676 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.888888889 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120481310093 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557187940629 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0186535782893 0.0843802449381 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870306789611 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0101285192932 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.