The given line graph illustrates the amount of trash in 4 different categories recycled between 1982 and 2010 in one particular country.
Overall, It is noticeable that paper and cardboard's recycling was always the highest in the period of time. However, plastics were always the lowest recycled materials among others in all years.
Now turning into the details, Paper and cardboard were increasing by 5% in the beginning of the period. Although, it dropped to 65% between 1986 and 1990. However, in only 4 years it had increased to 80% by 15%, which was the highest level of the whole period, and gradually dropped by the time. Furthermore, Aluminium cans were also gradually increasing. At the beginning of the period, between 1984 and 1986 it was only about 5%, Even though it increased to 45% eventually in all period of time.
As I mentioned at the beginning, Plastics were always the lowest among others in all years. it had not almost changed during the time. It had only increased by 6%. Lastly, Glass containers were quiet same as paper and cardboards. It was decreasing at the beginning, from 50% to 40%. However, it did not stand still. It started to rise since 1988 and rose till 60% in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...recycling was always the highest in the period of time. However, plastics were always the lowe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 483, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...h it increased to 45% eventually in all period of time. As I mentioned at the beginning, P...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...s the lowest among others in all years. it had not almost changed during the time....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82296650718 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59973777103 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6301297721 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.2 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.9333333333 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173411019169 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533836409366 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080196305583 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138068239139 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110734621801 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.