The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

The provided line graph represents an overview of the perceof four various materials ("Paper and cardboard, Glass container, Aluminium cans and Plastics")which recycled in a particular country from 1982 to 2010.

Overall, it is clearly seen that recycling of paper and cardboard and glass containers increased after fluctuation; whereas, aluminium cans ascended gradually over the periods.

Almost 65% paper and cardboard materials recycled in 1982 and it increased by 5% after four years. Subsequently, it rose significantly after declined and peaked at 80% in 1994. After 1994, it descended gradually to reach 70% in 2010. Glass containers recycled 50% in the beginning period, but that's rate dropped by 10% after eight years. From 1990 to 2010, it increased steadily to touch 60% in 2010.

On the other hand, aluminium cans and plastics did not recycle in the beginning four years. In 1986, aluminium cans recycled nearly 5%. The recycling rate aluminium cans climbed up step by step from 1986 to 2010 and it was approximately 45% in the end of period. Furthermore, the recycling rate of Plastics were least of position compared to the others three materials and it increased literally to reach nearly 10% in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., Aluminium cans and Plastics'which recycled in a particular country from 19...
^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...cycled 50% in the beginning period, but thats rate dropped by 10% after eight years. ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, whereas, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2538071066 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97234888494 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53807106599 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7982281195 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0909090909 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261345595179 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104438689192 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747838748393 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159924379489 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815836404248 0.0819641961636 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.