The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of four types of materials being recycled in a given country between 1982 and 2010.
Overall, while paper and cardboard together with glass containers witness several fluctuations in the recycling rate, aluminum cans as well as plastics underwent a relatively ascending trend.
Looking at the chart, it is noticeable that paper & cardboard were the main materials that were mostly recycled throughout the period, with figures ranging from 65% to 70%. To be more specific, commencing at 65% in 1982, the group witnessed a few fluctuations before declining gradually from 80% to 70% in the later phase of the time surveyed. On the other hand, glass containers experienced an opposite trend, with the proportion of recycling declining to 40% before ascending steadily to 60% from 1990 to 2010. In addition, aluminum cans showed a notable difference. Despite being recycled later in 1986, the material rose dramatically in the recycling rate from 5% to reach 45% at the end of the period. Lastly, insignificant proportions belonged to plastics, with figures starting with 3% in 1990 and barely reaching 10% in 2010.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, look, well, while, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26486486486 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88398643054 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616216216216 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1434926233 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216245330991 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969675655086 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676726546738 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148827585953 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920450366176 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.