The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrates and compares the elderly ratio of three nations in three different continent. Giving a demonstration in a period of a century, this graph is also features a short-term prediction.
The overall trends demonstrate an increasing rate over a century. Although Japan had the lowest proportion of elderly people, this country will have the highest proportion among the other specified nations.
In 1940, the people aged 65 and above formed below 10% of the total population in their own country. This ratios were about 9, 7 and 5% for USA, Sweden and Japan, respectively. This trend remained the same until 1996, where Sweden overtook USA, achieving the highest proportion of elderly people among the other two. From 1996 until now, Sweden had the highest fraction of the aged people. Until 2028, a steady trend will govern the proportion.
Based on the prediction, we expect to observe an abrupt and sharp increase in the Japan’s proportion between 2028 and 2033, where its trends will overtake the USA’s in 2030 and Sweden’s in 2033, achieving the first place among the country with the highest proportion of elderly people among the other two and keep it until 2040.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'continent' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'continents'.
Suggestion: continents
...tio of three nations in three different continent. Giving a demonstration in a period of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
... total population in their own country. This ratios were about 9, 7 and 5% for USA, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14646464646 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67976295157 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580808080808 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 79.5060375066 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129640063137 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528712217699 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046664531315 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802616278953 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180693501455 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.