The graph below shows the proportion of revenue for three film types romance, comedies, and action/horror for a Hollywood film studio from 1970 to 2000.
The bar chart gave the illustration of the percentage of income for three film genres: romance, comedies, action.
Overall, the turnover of romance plunges in its popularity, producing revenue less at the end of the period and that of action film increase rapidly, specifically in the final year. Meanwhile, comedies indicate a mild fluctuation over and over time.
In 1970, the most popular is romance, which occupied moreover 50% of the entire studio company’s revenue, go with that rate of romance types is the comedies turnover constituting almost 30% out of all. Whereas, the action’s revenue percentage just nearly reach to 10%.
By 2000, there was a dizzying dropping in the proportion of revenue for romance from over 50% to under 10%. In reverse, horror showed a contrasting pattern in the revenue, which accounted for approximately 36%. The share of comedies’ income peaked to highest of its rate up to 35% in 1980 before steadily declining to 30% by 2000
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart gave the illustration of t...
^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ver constituting almost 30% out of all. Whereas, the action’s revenue percentage just n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09375 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81790452952 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6410930522 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367076815918 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128551553488 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697902086286 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186756403778 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511612423797 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.