The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned line graph illustrates the amount of goods transported by four means of transportation namely road, water, rail and pipeline over the period from 1974 to 2002 in the United Kingdom.
Overall, as is represented by the line graph, road was the mostly used modes of transportation, while relatively small quantities of goods were transported by using pipeline in UK between 1974 and 2002.
It is evident that roads carried significantly large amount of goods, which was more than 60 million tonnes during 1974, while it rose gradually and reached nearly 100 million tonnes in 2002, on contrast pipeline was the least preferred transportation that carried less than 20 million tonnes from 1974 to 1990, but after that time the ratio slowly elevated and remained constant from 1994 to 2002.
However, during 1974 both waterways and railways had figure of 40 million tonnes, but former showed the uptrend and reached more than 60 million tonnes, on the contrary the latter showed the fluctuating nature and finally had accounted more than 40 million tonnes in 2002.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17613636364 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6433037082 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585227272727 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.5394843006 43.030603864 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 227.75 112.824112599 202% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.0 22.9334400587 192% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 5.23603664747 234% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211674382361 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151348814784 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849856767061 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151348814784 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849856767061 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.0 13.2329268293 189% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.74 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.