The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph gives information about the amount of goods carried by various types of passage over a 28 years from 1974 to 2002 in the United Kingdom. Unity is measured in million tonnes.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest amount of goods were transported by the road while pipeline had experienced an opposite to the road. Water showed an increase in the figure of the transportation of goods. There was a fluctuation in the sum of a train.
The volume of road started at almost 70 million tonnes in 1974. This figure went up gradually over 80 billion tonnes till 1992 but it showed a sight decrease 79 billion tonnes in 1996 but at end of the period it was rocketed which was almost 99 million tonnes. Water was the second highest method of transportation which begins with approximately 39 million tonnes which rises in 1980 till almost 56 million tonnes at the end of period it was above 61 million tones.
Throughout the entire period goods transported to UK via rail remained between 40 and 60 billion tonnes thought it have experienced ups and downs. In 1974, nearly 3 billion tonnes of good were transported but slowly it went up above 20 million tonnes in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...he United Kingdom. Unity is measured in million tonnes. Overall, it can be seen that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...een 40 and 60 billion tonnes thought it have experienced ups and downs. In 1974, nea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6380952381 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56199327162 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7134299795 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198110879569 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862738275175 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698425404398 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136329643362 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065695149408 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.