The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1988.
The table compares the amount of money spent in United Kingdom on food, electronic equipment, music and videos in 1988 among adults (men and women) as well as children (boys and girls).
Overall, it can be seen that the highest figure of expenditure among adults was the food and the least was on the videos. Whereas, children have spent much of their money on music, they have given very less attraction to the food.
According to the graph, adults have spent quarter percentage on food, in which both male and female have spent 14% and 39% respectively. Spending money on electronic equipment was 5% in females which was doubled in male. Music was constant in adults which was 5%. Going ahead, music remained under 2% in the grownups but the figure male was high which was 2%.
Music captured the attraction of children in all the four items, after that videos was also famous around the kids where they spent near 20% of money. Furthermore, they have spent less money (9% boys and 11% girls) on food as compared to the adults.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66483516484 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24502159588 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543956043956 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2422428187 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0741448848072 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354513157433 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388549365341 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582785874711 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358066346441 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.