The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrated the quantities of good four modes of transport carried in the UK over 26 years.
Overall, all four modes of transport were likely to go up during the period when the infrastructure has been improved day by day.
The quantity of goods road transferred started at the point of 70 million tonnes in1974, while water's and road's are quite as much as each other with approximately 40 million tonnes. And the pipeline- the lowest had carry under 10 million tonnes. From 1974 to 1991, the amount of pipeline increased gradually by 13 million tonnes, the same with water but by 20 million tonnes. During these years, the quantity of goods road transported had a slight decline between 1978 and 1982 then went up gradually and had a peak at 81 million tonnes.
After being overtaken by mode of water, there's a decrease in the number of goods carried by rail. 3 modes of transport went down slightly from 1992 to 1995 except pipeline. Then only pipeline mode remain steady at 25 million tonnes in the number of goods, the three others increase again with the highest of 98 million tonnes was road mode
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'carried'.
Suggestion: carried
...onnes. And the pipeline- the lowest had carry under 10 million tonnes. From 1974 to 1...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'carried'.
Suggestion: carried
...onnes. And the pipeline- the lowest had carry under 10 million tonnes. From 1974 to 1...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...After being overtaken by mode of water, theres a decrease in the number of goods carri...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72081218274 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43307705367 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598984771574 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0083878286 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170797051578 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851197776608 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798515666628 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139890418695 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084919408138 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.