The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given line graph shows the differences of 4 commodities transported in the UK during the period 1974 to 2002. It is clearly seen from the given line graph is that there was an upward trend in the quantity of road transported in 1974 whereas there was a stability trend in the quantity of pipeline transported.
In general, from 1974 to 1978 witnessed a slight drop in the quantity of rail to 40 million of tonnes. After that, a gradual decrease was noticed in the quantity of road in 1982. In the opposite, a rapid rise was seen in the quantity of water from 40 to nearly 60 million tonnes at the same time.
Looking at the number of road, it was a moderate growth in the number of road transported between 62 and 82 million tonnes from 1982 to 1990. In other hand, the period from 1982 to 1990 saw a plateau in the number of the pipeline. The quantity of rail fluctuated dramatically from 25 to 22 million tonnes between 1986 and 1994. That was happened with the number of the road at the same time. From 1974 to 2002, the quantity of road reached a peak at 98 million tonnes and this is the highest number in that period
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32547169811 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41562402063 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429245283019 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3545045352 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156789940133 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767304923419 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839945319946 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128229123584 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862238437233 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.