The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the comparison of 4 different ways of transport( road, water, rail and pipeline) carrying consumer products in the united kingdom over 28 years from 1974 to 2002. Units are shown in a million tonnes.

Overall, the most amount of goods transported in the UK had been through roads while water and rail were equally popular at the beginning of the period, however, the water transportation exceeded the rail. The pipeline was the least popular mode of transportation of goods in England.

With regards to the road, about 75 million tonnes of good were transported in 1974. This figure fluctuated over the years. However, in 1994 it dramatically increased to about 100 million tonnes in 2002. This mode of transportation was widely used from the start to end of the period. The water and rail nearly overlapped at about 40 million tonnes for about 4 years. While in 1978 the transportation of the products by water increased over the years, carrying more than 60 million tonnes in 2002. However, the goods transported by rail plunged for few years. In 1998 it rose its transportation again to about 41 million tonnes in 2002.

On the other hand, the least popular way of goods transportation was the pipeline which stood at about 5 million tonnes only in 1974. However, in 1982 it surged to about 18 million tonnes and finally crossed over 20 million tonnes in 2002.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87394957983 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71363522137 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1574797632 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8571428571 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192400871361 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838921863197 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059062425541 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136070571223 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337111075783 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.