the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport
The graph depicts information about the numbers of Good transported in Britain using four kinds of transportation’s methods from 1974 to 2002 counted by million tonnes
At a glance we can observe that the numbers of good transported in UK increased over the period in all type transportation. The highest good transported numbers were carried out by using road. By contrast, the pipeline transportation way was the most unfavorable methods for transporting the goods over the period.
At the beginning in 1974, the numbers of good transported by road stood at 70 and then show a fluctuated- increase until the end of period at almost 100 which was being the highest rank. The second highest was followed by the water transportation which experienced a fluctuated-uplift and brought around 65 million tonnes goods at the end period although this mode was in only less then 40 in 1974, below of rail mode.
The pipeline and rail were standing at about 5 and 40 in the beginning. Good transported by pipeline experienced a steadily upward over the period and stop at more than 20 million tonnes. Meanwhile, the rail witnessed a fluctuated movement under 40 until 1998 and closed the 2002 at slightly more than 40 million tonnes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...iod although this mode was in only less then 40 in 1974, below of rail mode. The pi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99029126214 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13118461437 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.8046414001 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307627649195 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140596998162 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958589532465 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206594494122 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090610012987 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.