The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph illustrates how the number of items transferred by four distinct transport ways changed in Britain from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, it is clear that the quantities of goods transported by road, water and pipelines experienced an erratic upward trend, while the number of items transferred by rail remained almost constant during the given period.
As can be seen from the graph that between 1974 and 1994, there was a fluctuated growth to around 80 million tonnes in goods transported by road. This was followed by a rapid rise in 1998. over the next 4 years, the quantities of items transferred in the UK rose negligible and by 2002, it had reached nearly 100 million tonnes.
If we look at items transported by water, it was a less popular mode of transport compared to the road. At the beginning of the period, the number of goods transferred by water stood at 40 million tonnes and increased slightly during the next 4 years. over the 4 years, there was a noticeable growth to about 55 million tonnes in transported goods by water and after that, the figure maintained almost the same level during the next 20 years and soared to nearly 70 million tonnes at the end of the period.
Regarding goods transported by pipelines between 1974 and 1994, it increased almost constantly and by 1994, it had reached a plateau and remained stable until 2002.
With respect to items transferred by rail, the figure showed an erratic downward trend from around 40 to 25 million tonnes in the years 1974-1994. over the next 8 years, the quantities of goods transported by rail back to the same number as at the beginning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...s was followed by a rapid rise in 1998. over the next 4 years, the quantities of ite...
^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...eased slightly during the next 4 years. over the 4 years, there was a noticeable gro...
^^^^
Line 11, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
... million tonnes in the years 1974-1994. over the next 8 years, the quantities of goo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, so, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 283.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78445229682 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6140529803 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445229681979 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9814783051 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.090909091 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303797699214 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129053718264 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788819916967 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177869290636 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471243435586 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.