The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line chart gives information on the amount of goods carried in the United Kingdom by
4 different kinds of transport from 1974 and 2002.
Overall, while there was a significant increase in the quantity of products transported on the road, in the water and through pipelines over the 28 year period, the figure for goods carried by trains remained almost stable. The majority of goods were transported on the roads.
The figure for roads was almost 70 million tonnes at the beginning of the period and this value increased gradually to reach about 80 million in 1995. After that, it rose sharply and it was just below 100 million tonnes in 2002. Similarly, goods transported through the pipeline, that was the least common mode of transport, were just below 5 millions in 1974 and kept growing until 1995 remaining stable at over 20 million for the rest of the period.
The amount of food transported by water and on rail was exactly the same between 1974 and 1982 at 40 million tonnes. After that, while the figure for those carried by water increased sharply and then remained almost stable just below 60 except for a slight decline in 1998, goods transported through pipeline decreased modestly to just below 35 million before going back to its initial value.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f goods carried in the United Kingdom by 4 different kinds of transport from 1974...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85321100917 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39676155553 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532110091743 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.3843905825 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270055196862 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142039149409 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764334510269 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181351953013 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100378838725 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.