The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the share of daily radio and television user in 1992. There was a fluctuating share of both media audiences. In addition, 8 pm accounted for the biggest number of the television viewer.
In the beginning, the figure of the radio listener was the highest among the two medias. It stood just over 5% in the early morning (6 am) and, reached a peak time two hours later at around 25%. Then, the percentage of radio listener experienced gradual decreased by 3 pm to about 12% and, rose more than 2% at 4 pm. Following that, the share showed a steady decreased a fins well as finalized the period at less than 5% the next day.
The share of TV viewer was null at the initial time and, saw a slight change from 8 to 12 am. After that, the figure observed considerably incline between 2 and 6 pm (approximately 10%) in the afternoon. Following which, it hit the highest number in the evening (more than 45%). Finally, the figure showed swift change from 10 pm and, ending the period with a similar number of that of radio.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a fin' or simply 'fins'?
Suggestion: a fin; fins
...at, the share showed a steady decreased a fins well as finalized the period at less th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48167539267 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52991747749 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586387434555 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2280388006 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.8181818182 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.080011812277 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337470397729 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397386588161 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0617807783933 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282538905256 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.