The graph below shows a satisfaction rating of the staff in four colleges from 1991 to 2002.
The graph shows the satisfaction rating of the staff in percentage terms for four colleges, during the eleven-year period, from 1991 to 2002.
Generally, just only college B and college C had seen some improvements in their satisfaction rates, while the other two had lost much appreciation from people about their staff.
before reaching the high ends, the rates in both college B and college C were volatile, especially from 1992 to 1995. For the next three years, the opposite pattern had been seen between the two, with a gradual rise up to approximately 65% for college B and a gradual falling down to 10% for the other. There was, however, a marked improvement in the satisfaction rate for college C to nearly 70% in 1999, followed by a steady rise during the last 3 years and it ended up at a very impressive rate, 80%. Meanwhile, college C remained its rising till the end of the eleven-year period, with the last percentage of just 10% less than college B.
The two colleges left, A and B, on the contrary, both ended the period with approximately 20% lower than the first year’s level. however, before suffering from a sharp decline in the last year, college D had very stable rates which were always around 30-40% for continuous 10 years, while college A experienced a much more erratic pattern with more downs than ups, leading to a very poor rate in the end, at 40%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Before
...ation from people about their staff. before reaching the high ends, the rates in bo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 643, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...centage of just 10% less than college B. The two colleges left, A and B, on the c...
^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...lower than the first year's level. however, before suffering from a sharp decline ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70081967213 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64454482041 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553278688525 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.934331877 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.375 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311123048934 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155478537752 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141049541886 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236534736609 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154675758627 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.