The graph below shows trends in U.S meat and poultry consumption
The line graph compares the figure for meat and poultry consumption per capita in the U.S from the year 1955 to 2012.
At first sight, beef was the most popular type of meat over nearly 60 years and the number of broilers used rose significantly. However, there was no change considerably for pork and turkey product.
In 1955s, there were only two types of meat: beef, with a little higher in consumption per person than pork, around 55 pounds, and 50 pounds respectively. Six years later, in 1961, less common than meat, poultry meat was estimated 5 pounds of turkey and 15 pounds of broilers on an individual.
In the next point of time, in 1976s, the amount of beef consumption rose nearly twice and reached a peak of 90 pounds, then felt rapidly in the following years to 50 pounds. The amount of using broilers rose five times, got 60 pounds for an individual in 2006 and then kept stable in the years later. Opposit to beef consumption, the use of turkey took the lowest rate although a slight increase to 10 pounds but not made a considerable difference. The last one, port using per head had a fluctuation between 40 pounds to 50 pounds over the same period time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...poultry consumption per capita in the U.S from the year 1955 to 2012. At first ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58767772512 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49199883122 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597156398104 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8966346039 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.555555556 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138926369096 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643074904477 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828969189762 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117901189105 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973617453314 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.