In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salary. Some people believe that is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allowed salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these view and give your own opinion.
In many countries, there is a small part of people living with extremely high incomes. Some people believe that brings good results for the country, while others argue that salaries should be controlled at a certain level by governments. From my point of view, I support the idea that a high level of salaries is good for the country.
Earning an extremely high salary in a minority group of people may lead to a good outcome for countries. The reason I agree is the taxes that depend on individual income. In most countries, the rich must pay up to 20-30% their salary into the government budget which helps to increase GDP and the whole country's development. Besides, if a career worth having a high salary, such as in the military or medicine aspect, it will become a motivation for people to devote themselves. Therefore, a high level of income may have a positive result for the whole nation.
In contrast to that idea, some people still believe governments should control the salary not to surpass the medium level. The explanation is to avoid corruption which may lead to the shortage of government budget. In some industrial areas, sometimes the failure is accounted for corruption while the government invests a vast of money. In addition, the social balance between human to human is established when authorities are not allowed high-level incomes.
The wealth, who has extremely high incomes takes up a small part of the world., I believe that they will bring several benefits to their country. However, adversely, some disagree that authorities should not allow salaries above an average level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-12 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- The plans below show the public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by reporting and selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which maybe unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the main information by reporting and selecting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both views and give your own op 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s Summarise the information by collecting and reporting the main features and makes co
- In the future nobody will buy printed books or newspapers because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... most countries, the rich must pay up to 20-30% their salary into the government ...
^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people to devote themselves. Therefore, a high level of income may have a positi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97777777778 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66461855505 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562962962963 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8373556098 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425758058379 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137780527679 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902305555008 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255267860423 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767982563868 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.