The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant.

The diagram compares the layout of the typical office in Japan and America.
In general, it is clear that the Department manager occupies a central position in the Japanese office. In the American office, the conference rooms are included in the plan.
In the Japanese office, the department manager sits in front of the large window in the center area. The American office, however, has two windows on each side of the room, and the department manager is in the corner of the room in the right. While in the Japanese office the section managers sit in front of the department manager, the section managers in the American office are in the side of the department manager, but also in front of one of the windows.
There are two conference rooms, a printer copier, and a storage area on the left-hand side of the American office. In contrast, there are absent in the Japanese office. The desks of workers in the Japanese office sit in front of the section managers, whereas in the American office workers occupy separate individual desks. Finally, there is a chair outside the Japanese office for people waiting to enter the room.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...erence rooms are included in the plan. In the Japanese office, the department man...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79591836735 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46220916438 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423469387755 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7313896574 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149581062537 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701864034259 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03154188466 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102232388166 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320347715515 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.