The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002.
The table illustrates the spending on advertising for four different car manufacturing companies in the UK in the year 2002.
In general, it is clear that the amount of money for advertising of Renault was the highest. In addition, the expense of advertising on TV was the most popular while the opposite was true for cinema.
In 2002, Cetirizine spent the largest money on TV advertising at 70 million dollars, followed by the figure for Vauxhall at $65 million. The data for Renault and Rover was $59 million and $45 million, respectively. In terms of press advertising, the amount of money of Renault was the largest at $45 million, slightly higher than Rover at $38 million. In contrast, Cetirizine and Vauxhall spent less money on press advertising at 12 and $8 million, respectively.
Regarding the rest of the table, advertising on cinema and outdoor was less popular, all four companies just spent less $10 million on that. It is also notable that expenditure on the radio advertising was the same in four different car companies at $15 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hile the opposite was true for cinema. In 2002, Cetirizine spent the largest mone...
^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess money on press advertising at 12 and million, respectively. Regarding the re...
^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...s money on press advertising at 12 and million, respectively. Regarding the rest of t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while, in addition, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88700564972 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9721595389 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457627118644 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2484567313 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218941032357 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120018611521 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141709756851 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200041554799 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164696054917 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.