The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1996 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation.
The line graph represents the percentage of oil used in Iceland, Sweden, Italy, and Turkey from 1996 to 2006 as a proportion of each country's total energy consumption.
Overall, it is clear that Turkey's proportion of oil use surged over the 40-year period, whereas the share of oil usage in Italy remained relatively constant. Meanwhile, Sweden and Iceland's percentage plunged.
Looking at the graph more closely, one can see that Turkey had the lowest proportion of oil use in 1996. At this time, the nation relied on oil for around 60 percent of its energy needs, which was only two-thirds of the proportion Italy used. However, by the end of the period in question, Turkey's share was the same as Italy's at 90 percent. Italy's proportion was consistently high, maintaining a share of between 80 to 90 percent throughout the period.
In contrast, Sweden and Iceland saw steep percentage declines during the first half of the period, which each dropping approximately 40 percent. The share of oil use in Sweden continued to gradually decrease, reaching 35 percent by 2006. Iceland experienced a small percentage rise from 1986 to 1996 before dropping significantly to around 20 percent in 2006, the lowest share of oil use among the four countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07211538462 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76043190145 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2162598873 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280427373108 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116877300142 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992763853951 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199894188954 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103940778303 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.