The graph depicts the number of arrests per year for using illegal drug
The graph shows an amount of arrests per year for using drugs which is by illegal ways.
Overall,what stands out from the given data is that,there were significant changes in the drug consumes from 10 to 70 arrests between 1991 and 2005.
Loking at the information in more detail is that,in 1991 the number of illegal drugs stood at 10. Then it was seen a gradual increase over the next three years. There was a dramatic rise from around 22 in 1994 to 60 in 1995. The quantity of them remainde steady at 60 from 1996 to 1998. A sharp decrease was seen in the number of arrests for using drugs at approximately 38 over the period of 1999. The consumption of drugs peaked at well above 70 in 2000. It was the highest result over the given period. Then it witnessed a rapidly decline with 15 during the 2001. At the end of period, the using illegal drugs bottomed out at just under 50. In 2005,it reached a low of 40 arrests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 89
- It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead To what extend do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph depicts the number of arrests per year for using illegal drug 78
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 61
- The pictures below shows the recycling process wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , what
...ugs which is by illegal ways. Overall,what stands out from the given data is that,...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...t stands out from the given data is that,there were significant changes in the drug co...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...t the information in more detail is that,in 1991 the number of illegal drugs stood ...
^^^
Line 6, column 525, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('rapidly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...ver the given period. Then it witnessed a rapidly decline with 15 during the 2001. At the end of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 542, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iod. Then it witnessed a rapidly decline with 15 during the 2001. At the end of p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 758.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38150289017 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32586963334 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595375722543 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2968523148 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.1666666667 112.824112599 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.4166666667 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302815523683 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101944156969 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155934473541 0.0843802449381 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26440877597 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20435518283 0.0819641961636 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.4 13.2329268293 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 91.11 61.2550243902 149% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.53 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.